Talk:Atmavrittanta

India: Gujarat / Literature Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Copy editing[edit]

Hi Gog. If possible con you have a look on this draft? It is almost completed and need copy editing and paraphrasing. Feel free to do necessary changes in it. If you are busy with another stuff, It's ok. Thanks. Gazal world (talk) 16:12, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gazal world. I am a bit busy, but I squeezed in a rapid look at it. It seemed to be in good shape - I didn't need to do too much. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:48, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gog the Mild: Hi Gog. Is this a 'B' class or 'C' class article ? -Gazal world (talk) 15:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO it is C class. For B I would want to see a little more in the lead; currently it has nothing from the last four sections. Also, the lead states "Its publication was prevented for many years by his family members and friends because it contains explicit details of his extramarital relations and controversial views on morals", but this is not covered in the main article. Having the contents section expanded would be good, but is not IMO essential for B class. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Gog. I will work more on the points you suggested. -Gazal world (talk) 20:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now, Gog ? -Gazal world (talk) 11:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is looking good. If note a had a citation it would easily be B class. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citation added in note. Reassessed.-Nizil (talk) 07:32, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]