Talk:Attila Végh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 22 September 2013[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved per consensus. bd2412 T 13:59, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attila Vegh (fighter)Attila Vegh – There is a similarly named canoer named Attila Végh (note the "é"), who is comparatively much less notable. The proposed page redirected there, now redirects here. A "For the canoer, see..." would be appropriate in the fighter's article, but there is a clear primary topic. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC) 00:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
That wouldn't be terrible, but typically, a primary topic doesn't have a qualifier. Only the others. A disambiguation page is just extra click for readers, either way. They'll obviously be searching for one or the other. When there are just two topics, disambiguation is best done in one place, for user-friendliness. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:39, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - I looked in Google Books and only found Attila Végh (poet) (he didn't have an en.wp article prior but has a long article on hu.wp, and has a stub here now). The canoeist has lots of photos in competition (but no hu.wp article and is missing his date of birth). Consequently bumping Attila Végh on to Attila Végh (canoer) and creating a dab was justified whatever happens here. [obviously if anyone in this RM thinks canoer is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC over both the poet and fighter then that is easily reversed by any editor]
The Slovak-Hungarian "fighter Attila Végh" gets plenty of coverage in Slovak-Slovak sources "zápasník Attila Végh", Slovak-Hungarian sources (parameter.sk "MMA .. Végh Attila"), and Hungarian-Hungarian sources ("szlovákiai-magyar harcos, Végh Attila") ... he appears to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC in Slovakia and Hungary as well as in plain English Google. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That explains why I didn't see the poet. Now that he's a stub, I think we should move that to Attila Végh (disambiguation). The fighter is likely more well-known than both the others combined, by virtue of competing (and headlining) on Spike TV. Not sure if I should start a new RM, or if this can cover that. Seems like it could. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if we should name the fighter's article with the é or e. Probably proper in Slovakia, but English sources seem to always omit it. English Wikipedia, and he's most popular through English TV, so I'd lean toward "Vegh". There's probably a relevant guideline somewhere. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The guideline is to use sources which are reliable, per Wikipedia definition of reliable (WP:IRS) which usually means books with full unicode fonts. I didn't address this issue as its minor compared to WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and there are a few cases where we do distinguish on accent/lack of accent. But those cases are as I recall distinguishing an American from a non-American. This would be distinguishing a Hungarian from two other Hungarians with the same name which seems a bit silly.
As far as I can see WikiProject Mixed martial arts doesn't suffer from xenonymophobia. Most of the Brazilian fighters out of the Gracie stable who have retained Brazilian citizenship have also retained their Brazilian accents, the same as any other sport on Wikipedia. English sources which do have the fonts do use it: "Attila Végh... three uneven rounds", "our fighters split the Slovak Republic, .... Attila Végh. ", I imagine that MMA website editors are just less familiar with Hungarian accents than Brazilian ones, rather than having a English-names-for-Hungarians policy.
Having said that this is up to you at this point. I would support Attila Végh for the fighter, and move Attila Végh (currently dab for all 3) to Attila Végh (disambiguation). In ictu oculi (talk) 06:26, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds fine. His promotion's profile doesn't use the mark, but Wikipedia is its own thing. InedibleHulk (talk) 21:21, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attila VeghAttila Végh – Should be non-controversial, Hungarian-Slovak fighter per additional agreement in above RM, per Slovak and Hungarian sources, per English sources using Slovak/Hungarian accents e.g., per WP:AT title consistency with all other Slovak and Hungarian BLPs, with other Végh surname bios including Attila Végh (canoeist) and Attila Végh (poet). In ictu oculi (talk) 11:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Mildly support, per my saying it'd be fine. Kind of iffy because the promotion that made him most notable uses the pure Anglicized way. But his parents probably used the...whatever that thing is called acute accent. InedibleHulk (talk) 14:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support — Seems evident that the surname contains an acute accent in its original form. Poison Whiskey 20:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it's basically the same as French, "café," otherwise the e would be like e in "egg". In ictu oculi (talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Attila Végh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Attila Végh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]