This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
By the way, she went by the last name of "Augusta" starting in the late 1980s. [1] She may have even officially changed her last name. The purpose of this was to make it readable for international audiences. --Rick DeLong (talk) 01:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
She has never officially changed her last name, even in marriage. Augusta was her pen-name. --Dmitri Lytov (talk) 22:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I corrected some information — [2]. Socionics is a pseudoscientific theory according to RSs. --Q Valda (talk) 20:05, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
These are sources with very low weight. --ThesariusQ (talk) 08:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Many editors (including admins) do not agree with you — [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] etc. After next your revert I will ask the administrators to take action. --Q Valda (talk) 09:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
