Talk:Automated Content Access Protocol

What does ACAP provide what robots.txt does not? 92.227.200.214 (talk) 22:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Good question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.152.249.14 (talk) 13:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Does anyone have a particular objection to including that Telegraph article in the external links? As comment from a mainstream publisher it looks pretty relevant to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.152.249.14 (talk) 13:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

ACAP update's udpates

I undid http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Automated_Content_Access_Protocol&diff=283974930&oldid=283620685 for reasons stated in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Automated_Content_Access_Protocol&diff=next&oldid=283974930 then added one of the changes in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Automated_Content_Access_Protocol&diff=next&oldid=284029588 ... some of User:ACAP Update's additions to the rest of the article should be evaluated for rewriting and re-adding in a neutral fashion. Mike Linksvayer (talk) 17:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Currency

If nothing's happene since March 2008 can this really still be called 'proposed'? When should time be called on notability?

How about we call time now? I'll add the notability tag in the hope of attracting a debate on the matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.152.249.14 (talk) 09:30, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Suggest we merge this into the article on DRM. 77.102.94.18 (talk) 22:35, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Added notability tag. No search engines have taken up the standard, nothing's happened here for three years. Initial coverage not bad, nothing lately. Ending with a whimper? Soupy sautoy (talk) 19:31, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Unclear how lack of recent coverage is relevant. Mike Linksvayer (talk) 15:57, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Automated Content Access Protocol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080318054618/http://blog.searchenginewatch.com:80/blog/080313-090443 to http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080313-090443
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080318122928/http://www.itwire.com:80/content/view/17206/53/ to http://www.itwire.com/content/view/17206/53/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715223737/http://www.iptc.org:80/site/Home/Media_Releases/News_syndication_version_of_ACAP_ready_for_launch_and_management_handed_over_to_the_IPTC to http://www.iptc.org/site/Home/Media_Releases/News_syndication_version_of_ACAP_ready_for_launch_and_management_handed_over_to_the_IPTC
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070610171119/http://www.the-acap.org/press_releases/Frankfurt_acap_press_release_6_oct_06.pdf to http://www.the-acap.org/press_releases/Frankfurt_acap_press_release_6_oct_06.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061111015733/http://www.yelvington.com/20061016/why_you_should_care_about_automated_content_access_protocol to http://www.yelvington.com/20061016/why_you_should_care_about_automated_content_access_protocol
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070315105714/http://www.the-acap.org:80/faqs.php to http://www.the-acap.org/faqs.php#existing_protocols
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070127201118/http://blog.searchenginewatch.com:80/blog/060922-104102 to http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060922-104102
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061021020607/http://www.shore.com/commentary/newsanal/items/2006/200601002publishdrm.html to http://shore.com/commentary/newsanal/items/2006/200601002publishdrm.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061111015733/http://www.yelvington.com/20061016/why_you_should_care_about_automated_content_access_protocol to http://www.yelvington.com/20061016/why_you_should_care_about_automated_content_access_protocol
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061114082058/http://www.wildlyappropriate.com/article/139/automated-content-access-protocol-why to http://www.wildlyappropriate.com/article/139/automated-content-access-protocol-why

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC)