Talk:Automated vacuum collection

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disadvantages[edit]

I would mention the disadvantages this tecnology has: pipe lifetime if metals or glass is collected. --Palladipeloarancione (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was agree to merge. Long overdue merger probably due to a lost tag. Operator873^CONNECT 03:00, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I fully support the proposed merge - these are effectively duplicate articles. If there is no dissent I will make it happen. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:38, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree and done. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hype vs Reality[edit]

The problem with finding information on which systems are actually in place world-wide is that the information available consists mostly of hyped-up press releases. Lots of promises and hype regarding future systems, and few facts. For example, there is a lot of press available about the Montreal vacuum waste system, but after a bit of digging I discovered that it had actually been cancelled.

It makes me wonder if the examples of installed systems-- at least those without references -- should just be deleted. They make the article sound like advertising. 198.58.150.217 (talk) 06:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Automated vacuum collection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710194217/http://www.envacgroup.com/web/Vacuum-system_history.aspx to http://www.envacgroup.com/web/Vacuum-system_history.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disney World[edit]

Disney World's Magic Kingdom in Florida has a large vacuum collection system under the park. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_utilidor_system & https://www.worldofwalt.com/disney-underground-trash-tubes.html This could be referenced/linked to in this article.Jtrnp (talk) 22:02, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]