Talk:Avia Solutions Group

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Lithuania Mid‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Aviasgwiki (talk · contribs) has been paid by unknown.
Agne for ASG (talk · contribs) has been paid by Avia Solutions Group on their behalf. Disclosure

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Avia Solutions Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Subsidiaries" section[edit]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The requested changes are unable to be implemented with the information supplied.

Would someone kindly add a new "Subsidiaries" section to the article with subsections for FL Technics and Baltic Ground Services (with content added from the drafts for the two companies). Both subjects failed AfC submissions as reviewers believe that not enough content exists for them to merit their own articles, so for now it would be best to have the merged to the Avia Solutions Group article. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 21:09, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 13-NOV-2018[edit]

Unable to implement

The information found within the Baltic Ground Services draft was found by K.e.coffman to contain advertising-like material. That same restriction which prevents it from being created under AFC also prevents it from being added as content, per WP:NOTADVERTISING.
The information found under FL Technics was deemed by Robert McClenon as being possibly allowed for merging into the Avia Solutions Group article. For that to occur, a verbatim description of the text to be added needs to be proposed here on the talk page. Additionally, of the 31 references supplied in the FL Technics draft, an editor at the TeaHouse noted the ones I did check are not to "reliable independent published sources with in-depth discussion of the subject". If you have found any such sources, I suggest you make them easier for a reviewer to find by removing most of the others. While not strictly being a content restriction, the suggestion found there regarding reference accessibility seems to be a prudent one for our purposes here.

When ready to proceed with the requested information, please open a new {{request edit}} template at your earliest convenience. Regards, Spintendo 09:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a case that illustrates a problematic side effect of the rules on paid editing. Since paid editors are prohibited from directly editing an article in which they have a conflict of interest, they simply throw in a generalized edit request that says essentially, "We are not allowed to do this, but we have a right to have it done for us. You do it for us." Volunteer editors have every right to just say no, that there are limits to how much assistance they will give paid editors. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FL Technics history updates.[edit]

Ahunt, as much as I value your contribution to the Wikipedia, the edits you make on FL Technics Wikipedia article are not valid. The company did expand by opening new hangars how is that a promotion? The company also created a training division which is an integral part of the company. Other companies like Boeing, Airbus in their wiki articles are allowed to disclose such information, whereas FL Technics can only disclose the date it was founded. Why 2011 entry about Storm Aviation acquisition is okay and the one from 2020 about Flash Line Maintenance once is not okay anymore? I would kindly ask you to explain or rather write the history as you see fit. The explanation of "STILL A LOT OF WP:SPAM; WP:TRIVIA and WP:PROMOTION" does not give clear indication where the problem lies, because Storm Aviation and Flash Line maintenance acquisitions are worded in the same way, but one is not accepted, although other one is...— Preceding unsigned comment added by Spontiac (talk • contribs) 07:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Draft for article[edit]

The user below has a request that an edit be made to Avia Solutions Group. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest.
The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 164 requests waiting for review.

Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

Hi, My name is Agne, and I work for Avia Solutions Group. The current article appears to have been translated and is somewhat difficult to read. I have gone through existing reliable sourcing and created an alternative draft that focuses on the company's history and business model. The new draft is clearer and more easily understandable. You can see it here. I propose that the existing page be replaced with this new version. I am aware of Wikipedia policies for COI editors, and I am excited to work together with the community to improve this entry moving forward. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Thank you.Agne for ASG (talk) 13:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]