This article was nominated for deletion on 14 September 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
My inclination would be to put in, say, two or three of his most-cited articles on Scholar—which does not appear to include the CLR article currently listed—but in any event I'm not sure how useful these sections are generally, since someone who wants to read the article would likely just search for it directly. I mainly dropped in the book to show that it had received reviews/was notable. Would welcome input on this. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would put five or six. BD2412T 16:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
