Talk:Ayer (Luis Miguel song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAyer (Luis Miguel song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 5, 2022Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ayer (Luis Miguel song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will get on with this now! --K. Peake 08:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • The recording is not sourced as beginning in June 1992 in the body, nor is it as ending in May 1993
  • Only put (A & B) per Template:Infobox song on the studio parameter
  • The first para of the lead is out of order; place production as the seconds sentence, then release, followed by the Spanish language and ballad sentences
  • "The track is a" → "It is a"
  • "handled the track's production." → "handled the song's production."
  • ""Ayer" was released as" → "It was released as"
  • Move the music video sentence to being in the second para directly after commercial performance
  • "and was nominated" → "and were nominated" or mention which one if you can source it
  • Remove pipe on 1994 Lo Nuestro Awards
  •  Not done should only be linked on one occasion --K. Peake 09:19, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move the critical reception sentence to being the last of the first para instead
  • Pipe 1994 Lo Nuestro Awards to Premio Lo Nuestro 1994 on the song of the year mention
  • "it became his eight number one song" → "it became Miguel's eighth number one song"

Background and composition[edit]

  • Remove the comma before Romance
  • Are you sure there should be a comma before "and the United States" in this form of English?
  • If the quote about not trying more boleros is a full sentence, then place the punctuation inside quotes and add a comma after replied
  • "He began working with" → "The singer began working with"
  • "or sing in it"." → "or sing in it."" per MOS:QUOTE
  • "he decided to co-produce the album" → "the singer decided to co-produce it" to be less repetitive
  • The composed sentence feels like too much of a run-on; add a comma after Aries to help with this
  • "David Foster and Jeremy Lubbock's instrumental" → "Foster and Jeremy Lubbock's instrumental"
  • "from Foster's 1986" → "from the former's 1986"
  • ""Ayer" is a" → "It is a"

Promotion and reception[edit]

  • Should there really be a comma before "and Gustavo Garzón"?
  • "the videos "takes you through the" → "the videos take one "through the" because this is referring to more than one
  • "each other intensely."" → "each other intensely"." per MOS:QUOTE
  • Either specify which video was nominated at the 6th Annual Lo Nuestro Awards or change to they were nominated
  • "On the review of album," → "In his review of the album,"
  • "called it a" → "called the song a"
  • Remove wikilink on Lo Nuestro Awards
  • "and as well as the inaugural" → "as well as the inaugural"
  • "Miguel's eight number one song" → "Miguel's eighth number one song"
  • Remove pipe on Billboard
  • "It was sixth best-performing" → "It was the sixth best-performing"

Personnel[edit]

Performance credits[edit]

  • Make this a sub-heading instead of a sub-section

Technical credits[edit]

  • Same as above

Charts[edit]

  • Good

See also[edit]

  • Good

References[edit]

Final comments and verdict[edit]

  •  On hold until all of the issues are fixed, after this quick review! --K. Peake 09:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll have this done either Sunday or Monday as those are my days off from work. Erick (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Requesting an extra week. Erick (talk) 02:32, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kyle Peake:  Done Let me know how it looks now. Erick (talk) 03:48, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Magiciandude: I have marked any changes missed as not done. Cheers, --K. Peake 09:19, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! I'm just confused on how the subsections for the personnel are supposed to be done. Erick (talk) 17:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]