Talk:Azimi Q models

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

At first I was so confused because I read this article and then found The Kjartansson constant Q model with almost the same info. My first question was what makes them differnt. In trying to figure this out I have come to a few conclusions:

No need for a basic section. It looks like basic was written like an abstract. The lead section should introduce the topic to a reader. The TOC will tell the reader the topics they will see and then the article's text itsself will tell the reader what they are reading.
The Kolsky model does not need its own section on every page. Instead, just have all the info on the one page. I would have named it "The Kolsky model" but I found that The Kolsky basic model and modified model for attenuation and dispersion was already written.