Talk:BAWAG P.S.K.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger[edit]

  • for - both pages are about the same thing (131.130.121.106 18:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]
  • against. simply because two companies merged does not mean that their respective articles have to be merged as well into a third. also both articles are different, they are not about the same thing. Gryffindor 13:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • for - I thin an article named BAWAG PSK and an article named PSK would be quite nice, the BAWAG PSK article with BAWAG stuff since it have been founded until now and PSK stuff since BAWAG have it acquired and the article about PSK with stuff since it have been founded until BAWAG had it purchased or merged. .tom 16:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • for. same subject mentioned on both articles, should first expand 1 and have 1 good article than 2 measly written ones. Lincher 20:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • for. BAWAG P.S.K is the bank carrying on the legacy of two formerly distinct organisations. Therefore it makes sense to include any information about the former companies under the name of the new entity.--Felix Kronabetter 12:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • for. And it should be done soon! Since now the BAWAG is sold to Cerberus ... - Josef Spindelböck 20:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • for. Since there is now one business, it makes sense to have a single page which describes the history of both parts of the company. (Having separate pages for historical entities does not make sense - some large companies have a history which includes hundreds of acquisitions and mergers - to have separate pages for each historical company would result in fragmentation which would make it impossible for readers to comprehend.) I guess we will have to wait and see whether Cerberus will make any further changes to BAWAG PSK structure e.g. to gain synergies with GMAC. PF 18:24 25 February 2007 (UTC) P.S. Let's do it soon.
  • Against. The separate BAWAG and P.S.K. articles contain company histories and seem to be satisfactory articles for further expansion. BAWAG P.S.K. should be a separate article that refers to these two articles using {{main}} and {{subst}} templates for historical information, and also should be expanded with new content from the post merger era. -- Emana 07:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Against. I agree with User Emana - the PSK article is about the history of the Postsparkasse - the BAWAG PSK about the then newly formed company. They are different topics. Ferdinand h2 (talk) 05:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BAWAGPSK NEU cmyk 300.jpg[edit]

Image:BAWAGPSK NEU cmyk 300.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BAWAGPSKNEW.jpg[edit]

Image:BAWAGPSKNEW.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

36 million[edit]

Bruce WILLIAM BERCIER junior 510 Martinville Loop NE BELCOURT ND 58316 TURTLE MOUNTAIN band of Chippewa reservation 50yrs old BROWN hair and eyes 5-5 tall SSI number 50274 Chippewa ID 304-U019 Cell number +1(701)278-2627 Bruce W BERCIER jr (talk) 15:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]