Talk:BLU-109 bomb

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BLU-109 bomb article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Hardened penetrator? Does anyone else find this name strange? Gamernotnerd (talk) 16:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why would it be retired? The SDB is only 250 lb whereas the 109 is 2000 lbs. They are meant for different applications. Lamjus 08:22, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The SDB is equal in penetration power. What applications did you have in mind for this bomb over the SDB? --The1exile 18:44, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The SDB is going to be used for very specific purposes. SDB and BLU-109 are like apples and oranges.

Sources, References and citations needed[edit]

This article is extremely incomplete, in structure and content. It needs references, sources and citations; so it can be expanded into a reasonable article.
I'll tag as "references needed" (no relevant tagging yet!) and add some structure; also will try to find some additional info online (don't have reference books on this topic handy).
Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 06:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BLU-109 bomb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525133718/http://www.hill.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5752 to http://www.hill.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5752

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]