Talk:BMW Z4 (E89)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The GS6-53BZ (Z4 35i) transmission is made by ZF Friedrichshafen not Getrag

Untitled[edit]

All BMW Z4 have in series safety equipment: Beside ABS including brake assistant and CBC (Cornering Brake control) pretensioner and belt load limiter, ESP with ASR are present. Furthermore four Airbags (driver/front seat passengers and two sideairbags). The dynamic stop light indicates, how strongly the vehicle is braked. In the case of an emergency braking the brake light is flashing headed for and switched on shortly before vehicle stop the warning flashing. To the protection with an estimate two being certain overroll bars are blocked behind the head restraints.

~This needs rewriting in proper english or deleting —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.138.17.220 (talk) 14:20, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yea I don't even know what the last two sentences mean.--151.190.254.108 (talk) 20:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merging of the Zagato concepts[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 23:12, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this off. I'm against the proposed merging of BMW Zagato Coupe and BMW Zagato Roadster into BMW Z4 (E89). I think, instead, we should have a little section called "Special Variants" (or something like that) with a "Main Article" link at the top. Thoughts on this? LatestAutos (talk) 08:24, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The BMW Zagato Coupe article was up for deletion, so I think merging would be preferable than losing the article entirely, andwill work well with LatestAutos suggestion of special variants... Warren (talk) 09:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge or delete (a one-off show car isn't going to grow or be that notable - more of a news item than encyclopaedic entry, so either would be ok) - I would have thought the scope of Zagato is more appropriate than the BMW articles (of the uncustomised car)....or, are these cars officially BMW? Widefox; talk 12:23, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. Very few one-off concepts merit their own article. I think at this point it would be better to have a section under either BMW Z4 (E89) or Zagato, although I think this article is best. If the content about the vehicle grows to a size because of additional references and notability, then it can be split off into its own article again. Merging may be the best way to save the content. And BMW and Zagato "worked in close collaboration to create" the vehicle (according to the Pebble Beach Concours program), so that probably makes it officially BMW. 72Dino (talk) 14:21, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay. Looking at the results, it looks like it's going to be a merge. So, how should we do this? I'll do it now, you can always alter it if you want to. -LatestAutos talk 18:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to review Wikipedia:Merging before doing anything. 72Dino (talk) 19:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, Wikipedia doesn't make things easy...I've reverted everything. Someone else can have a go. -LatestAutos talk 19:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BMW Z4 (E89). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]