Talk:Baščaršija

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Baščaršija/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: One found and unlinked as no suitable target could be found.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 22:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:53, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Due to the large fire in the 19 century, today Baščaršija is twice smaller than it once was. Poor prose, rephrase - what large fire? "twice smaller"?

   On Baščaršija there are several important historic buildings, such as the Gazi Husrev-beg Mosque and sahat-kula. "On"? Why is "sahat-kula" lower case - and what is it?

   Before the arrival of the Ottomans in the largest settlement on Sarajevo field was the village square Tornik, which was located at the crossroad of the roads where today is the Alipašin's mosque. Appalling prose.

   Overall the prose is extremely poor, ungrammatical, wrong choice of words, etc. - this should never have been nominated in this shabby state.

   Lead does not summarise the article, please read WP:LEAD and the rest of the good article criteria.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   {http://wikimapia.org} is a wiki not a reliable source.

   What makes {http://www.visitsarajevo.ba/about-us.html} a reliable source?

   Much of the artcile appears to be a copy-paste or close paraphrase of {http://translate.google.com/translate?langpair=auto%7Cen&u=http%3A%2F%2Fkudsevdah-ljubljana.com%2Findex.php%3Foption%3Dcom_content%26view%3Darticle%26id%3D95%3Ahistorija-sarajevske-baarije%26catid%3D49%3Azanimivosti%26Itemid%3D67}

   {http://roker.bloger.hr/post/bascarsija/1118045.aspx} is a blog, not a reliable source.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Needs considerable expansion to fully to cover the subject

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   One image used which has correct tag and caption

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This is at best a start-class article. Please expand to artcile to fully cover the subject, get it copy-edited, learn how to format inline citations using templates and the language parameter, then take to peer review before thibnking about renominating. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baščaršija. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110114005915/http://www.visitsarajevo.ba:80/sightseeing/attractions/historical-sarajevo/bascarsija/ to http://www.visitsarajevo.ba/sightseeing/attractions/historical-sarajevo/bascarsija/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baščaršija. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110426050547/http://sarajevo.ba/ba/stream.php?kat=103 to http://www.sarajevo.ba/ba/stream.php?kat=103

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 3 December 2017 (UTC)