This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Dear DGG thank you for taking your time to clean up this article. After the review from Theroadislong (who is one of the most professional editors around) and edits from several editors (yourself included) how relevant are the COI and advert tags? The article seems neutral and non-promotional. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 10:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
advertising I will remove, because it refers to the present state of the article, but I do not like to remove coi because it is a reflection of the entire edit history.
But I'm not finished editing. I have 3 problems
We never include all the patents in detail , and rarely include any; when we do it's only one or two key ones at most.
We usually include only the most influential papers; if , as is usually the case, there's no good 3rd party source for which ones they are, we use the citation figures. Researchers will sometimes prefer to list the most recent, which may be a goood PR technique in attracting grants or students, but is not encyclopedic .
The key claim, that he is the "Co-inventor of natural language technology that evolved into Siri is sourced to a sentence that reads "he was the primary inventor of Dejima's patented agent-oriented technology ,...,the technology behind Apple's siri. Unfortunately this is published as the author bio at the end of an article he co-wrote, ref11 . This is not independent evidence. There is also the business periodical, which says "was one of the main inventors of the AI technology that later became the inspirational basis for Siri, " which it ""was one of the main inventors of the AI technology that later became the inspirational basis for Siri,is sourced by them "according to his LinkedIn page. " I haven't yet figured out how to seethe German newspaper article--it doesn't recognize I've deactivated adblock-- but I expect the same. Bothe of these are in any event highly qualified claim. The unqualified claim in the article and the infobox rely upon the headlines of the two articles--which are not under editorial control. Looking a tour article on Siri, it's clear he played a major role, but also that the importance of the various people's role is disputed. An explicit statement of this importance needs independent documentation. I'm trying to find a suitable wording. DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There could be just 1 Justia link for the patents. It is a trusted source and lists them all.
Newsweek article probably has the best wording “a computer scientist who played a role in Apple’s development of Siri". There is another one from Bloomberg saying “a computer scientist who helped lay the groundwork for Apple's Siri". Both are quite close to explaining his role. Even a brief look at Dejima’s patents shows that there were at least 3-4 people involved. Note that there are also certain claims made by Adam Cheyer on being the leader in development at Medium.com article, so I think that either one of them would be correct.
Publications are structured by date and importance. I thought about structuring them by Google scholar academic value but it shows that the most quoted works are patents. So I don’t have a clear solution for this. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:18, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
