Talk:Backup Exec

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Enterprise client-server backup#Administration Console|Administration Console]]
[[Enterprise client-server backup#Backing up interactive applications via coordinated snapshots|support the most common server applications]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Ad?[edit]

What's going on here? Are we providing an advertisement space for BE here? Why else would we link to a PDF describing how you can manage millions of BE servers centrally? What has this to do with an encyclopedia? -Thiesi 11:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Second that 68.45.4.118 16:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. A companies flap sheet needs only to be balenced with a bug report/limitations list.

I agree, totally an AD. Outrageous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.223.214.130 (talk) 10:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ad. Definitively. Alex (unsigned) 11:59, 26 Januar 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.159.101.179 (talk)

Stilly/stupid[edit]

"Backup Exec shared the same Microsoft Tape Format with Windows' built-in NTbackup." Isnt this kind of silly/stupid, since NTBackup says its based on Backup Exec, is copyright Veritas, and is basically a crippled version ( i.e. cannot do a few features ) of Backup exec 5? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.157.126 (talk) 21:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Backup Exec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing Change Discussion[edit]

The licensing area of the page is out of date and perhaps needs removal. It has nothing to do with the program functionality and licensing models can change yearly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.25.3.147 (talk) 20:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]