Talk:Badge of Military Merit

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 7, 2008, August 7, 2009, August 7, 2017, August 7, 2020, and August 7, 2023.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Badge of Military Merit article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Military history: North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

Expert attention[edit]

Please read the archive. I also attempted to get help with the article on the task force page. (no reply) There appears to be some controversy about whether the awards made after the first three are indeed the Badge of Military Merit. I'm not sure if the claim that the subsequent awards are also BMMs is wishful thinking from descendents or something on which historians need to do more research. "Lost" history, if you will. Scholarly references are needed. Many websites, including purpleheart.org, are starting to use this page as reference, which complicates web-only research. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the topic is controversial. A reliable source noting the controversy would be a good addition, even if the question is not resolved. Valfontis (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]