Talk:Baháʼí teaching plans

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bahá'í Faith, a coordinated attempt to increase the quality and quantity of information about the Baháʼí Faith on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.Bahá'í FaithWikipedia:WikiProject Bahá'í FaithTemplate:WikiProject Bahá'í FaithBahá'í Faith articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Second most widespread[edit]

This isn't in the citation given. 89.242.129.234 (talk) 16:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moving title[edit]

How about we move this to Baháʼí teaching plans and make it inclusive of the multi-year plans that started in the 1940s? I don't think this title needs its own article, but could be a sub-section of the new article. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 07:17, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yeap. Smkolins (talk) 18:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 November 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 18:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Entry by troops → Baháʼí teaching plans – Uncontroversial move, but an error came up while trying to move it myself. The new title is wider in scope and the old title would be a section on that page. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 18:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support unrecognizable, see UN security council docs in GBooks. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – I don't quite understand the previous editor's post but agree with the original justification. Also shouldn't revolve around long quotations from Baháʼí primary sources. Gazelle55 (talk) 01:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Consolidation[edit]

Pioneering (Baháʼí) and Entry by troops have already merged into this page. There are two other articles that are relevant: Ten Year Crusade and Knights of Baháʼu'lláh.

Here are my thoughts. The Ten Year Crusade article has the potential for notability that the other plans do not, but the page is currently very light and should probably merge into here until it is expanded. Another option is to merge Knights of Baha'u'llah into the Ten Year Crusade article. The other multi-year plans probably shouldn't get their own pages. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 07:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think they should both be merged here. The Knights of Baha'u'llah started with the Ten Year Plan but as the article clarifies some started their pioneering as late as 1990. Then as you say the Ten Year Crusade on its own is too short. Can be split off again later with better sources. I'll do the merging soon. Gazelle55 (talk) 01:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I missed this. I agree on merging here until content is grown. I agree the Ten Year Crusade could and should grow but the scholarship hasn't really been focused on it yet, or perhaps only on certain parts of it and not other parts of it. That's part of why I was asking about the affect inside the US which is mentioned in only one scholarly article perse and all the rest are just effectively primary sources (lists of cities and places that can be compared.) Smkolins (talk) 11:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

End of plans?[edit]

A hearsay thread for decades, based on a single speech by a House member, states there woul be no more plans after 2021 as the planet would be in (economic?) crisis. Any validity to this in actual messages from The House? CoachingChess (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A letter of 2020-11-25 said that 2022 will begin a new 9-year plan. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 19:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]