Talk:Bahadur Yar Jung

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

correct coding of the link[edit]

any one may correct the coding of the refrence [4] according to WP standanrds, as i am little confused in coding.--Omer123hussain (talk) 06:07, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nawab Bahadur Yar Jung in Khaksar uniform.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Nawab Bahadur Yar Jung in Khaksar uniform.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed 'Notable Family Members' section[edit]

Dear friends, I have removed the 'Notable Family Members' section from this article as none of the people listed seemed very notable by Wiki standards and also, because Wiki is not a directory nor a place for self or familial prmotion/self-aggrandizement. Nawab Bahadur Yar Jung's own importance and contributions to the Pakistan Movement should be basically focused on here, in my opinion. Thank you. 14:04, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Khani100

multiple issues with sources and citations[edit]

i have provided inline tags for the self published sources, for the benefit of other editors, i hope this satisfies editor Heironymous - -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 04:02, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

in attempting to remediate multiple issues with sources and citations[edit]

I have identified what I would expect to constitutes plagiarism or a copyright violation. At several paragraphs in this article are directly copied from the blog page that is cited as reference 1. The blog page is dated December 6, 2006 and the text was added to this article on May 13, 2011. Again, although the source is referenced, the material is directly reproduced from the cited source (in full paragraphs - so inline citation would not make sense to do). Datdyat (talk) 04:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC) I had intended to continue with improving the references in this article, but I am discontinuing this for the moment - in case the article is nominated for deletion due to the many sections that were copied, I do not want to invest more time in to it.Datdyat (talk) 05:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue[edit]

This article was correctly flagged for duplication of content from this 2006 posting, but investigation reveals it is far too extensive to simply excise. Content was entered here in May 2011, and some of the subsequent content brought into the article by the same contributor may also duplicate sources, as he was not yet familiar with Wikipedia's copyright policies. (See also Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20110828) It should be possible to revert the article to this version, but otherwise the content is likely going to need to be completely rewritten. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bahadur Yar Jung. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:42, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]