Talk:BakerHostetler

Cleveland Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

Please link the firm's entry to the following category list:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Law_firms_of_the_United_States

Since Baker is a law firm in the United States and is substantially larger in size and scope than other firms already on the page.

Also, please change the name of the firm's Wiki page to "Baker Hostetler" without the ampersand. Since our rebranding in 2007, we have stopped using the ampersand in our external marketing. Thank you.

Leecanes (talk) 20:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spam[edit]

The current version of this article is an advertisement which reads like it was lifted from a brochure somewhere. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed most of the spam, tagged for citation where appropriate, added an infobox, moved the page and added the category. Still pretty thin, but it's better than it was. Bovlb (talk) 21:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm out of time right now, but here are some potential sources: [1][2][3][4] Bovlb (talk) 22:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsubstantiated posting[edit]

The comment, "In 2008, Baker Hostetler's New York office enganged in unethical labor practices directly affecting many of their New York staff.[citation "needed]," is unsubtantiated/has not had a citation provided, as requested. For this reason, the firm would like for this comment to be removed.CG1214 (talk) 13:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Eyewitness" account[edit]

There is no evidence to substantiate the claim of unethical labor practices; an "eyewitness account" does not constitute third-party validation/confirmation. This posting should be removed immeciatelyCG1214 (talk) 14:50, 15 May 2008 (UTC)CG1214[reply]

You are correct that an eyewitness account does not constitute a reliable source. As the paragraph is explicit about its lack of sourcing, I have removed it. Bovlb (talk) 17:02, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse of posting privilege[edit]

Once again, a completely unsubstantiated posting has been added to the firm's profile page ("In 2008, Baker Hostetler engaged in suspect labor disputes with it's employees") by the same user who had previously posted similar comments. This should be removed immediately and this user should be prohibited from posting similar comments in the future to this page.CG1214 (talk) 20:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)CG1214.[reply]

Sarbanes-Oxley[edit]

The language describing Sarbanes-Oxley is uniformly positive not does not comply with the NPOV policy. Knowledgeable people have a range of opinions on Sarbanes-Oxley, and it should either be characterized neutrally, or with reference to both positive and negative views of the legislation. Circumspect (talk) 05:48, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BakerHostetler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080206003143/http://www.thelawyer.com:80/global100/ to http://www.thelawyer.com/global100/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on BakerHostetler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war[edit]

With this reversion, User:152.121.17.254 has engaged in WP:EDITWAR. Should he persist despite my repeated warnings, I shall report him at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. The underlying issue, as explained in my edit summary, is that Fusion GPS was never a client of BakerHostetler. It was the other way around. BH hired Fusion GPS.KalHolmann (talk) 15:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]