Talk:Balise

Bits or Bytes?

1000 bits or 1000 bytes? Tabletop (talk) 05:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm guessing bits, as 1000 bytes is a lot of data to transfer in the split second that the balise would be active, given that the telegrams need to be received three times to verify their contents, IIRC GorfGnome (talk) 13:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Minor point, but some readers are bound to notice that (3+12+10+85) + 830 does not equal 1023 and that (3+12+10+85) + 210 does not equal 340.198.91.9.101 ([[User talk:Paul Niquette (talk) 17:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)]) 17:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Hopefully clarified with pointing to the symbol encoding step before showing the telegram structure Guidod (talk) 19:08, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Pairs of balises

It is not correct, that a pair of balises always consist of one fixed and one switchable balise. First, it's not necessary to have a pair. Single balise groups (consisting of just one balise) are possible, too, when using ETCS (Eurobalises). Second, a balise group can be a pair and it may consist of two fixed balises also (ETCS). 29 July 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.14.226.39 (talk) 08:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Types of Balise

This article only goes into detail on the balises used by Ericsson/EBICAB ATC and derivatives (i.e. the French KVB). Does anyone have any information on the Belgian TBL system, which uses a different sort of balise? I can't find any sources about the other variants, or even articles which detail how the various systems work; I presume its some sort of radio-frequency electromagnetic induction, but I'm not sure. GorfGnome (talk) 13:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Security and authentication

How does the reader on the train know that the balise is a legitimate authorized device, and not one placed by a spoofer? Or for that matter, not one that got mixed up with one intended for another location? --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

There is no cryptography involved.... and it's up to the train driver to check malfunctions. In a way he does that on a daily basis. Guidod (talk) 19:51, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Cut out Eurobalise

I'd like to cut out the specifics of the Eurobalise into an extra article, just as it is common in other Wikipedias. It is actually possible to use balises without that digital encoding. Guidod (talk) 16:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

done. Guidod (talk) 15:41, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Balise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110813015343/http://www.ertms.com:80/media/2428/fact-3.pdf to http://www.ertms.com/media/2428/fact-3.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)