Talk:Bancroft Shed

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mills Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Textile Arts Low‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

A fact from Bancroft Shed appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 June 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Bancroft Shed gave up kissing the shuttle for health reasons?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bancroft Shed.

Wikipedia

Bradley Mill Engine[edit]

The article needs updating with details of the Bradley Mill Engine (ex Skipton) which is now also operational at Bancroft since September 2017. I don't have much in the way of good quality refs with citations at the moment though. --Entablature (talk) 14:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Loom quantities[edit]

Maybe I'm reading it wrong but the more looms system section seems to be claiming that 810,000 looms were in use nationally in 1915? If so this number seems far too low to me. There were approximately 100,000 in Burnley alone in 1910 Spinning the Web? --Trappedinburnley (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes question every figure. Graham p185 quotes Worralls Directory of the Lancashire Textile Industry as 808796 in 1916 but is not clear if that is National or Lancashire alone. It doesn't seem unreasonable that one eighth of them were in Burnley either way. The combination mills in Manchester had cut back. But add your references and doubts. -- Clem Rutter (talk) 18:26, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've not been able to find a useful source but I feel (based on the title of Worralls Directory and a bit of mental arithmetic) that the figures are for (pre 1974) Lancashire. I know we were big in weaving but I find it almost impossible to believe that we had 1/8 of the national stock of looms. --Trappedinburnley (talk) 19:47, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Title[edit]

Is there a reason why this article is called Bancroft Shed and not by its usual name Bancroft Mill? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.30.84.65 (talk) 15:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The primary written source we have is Stanley Graham- He describes a weaving shed on page 13. and on page 4 he explains how these two practically synonymous terms are used. To quote, ... if it started doing preparation, spinning and weaving it was mill,if it concentrated solely on weaving it was named a shed.... This is the convention I followed. Generically, all were mills. Now that memories of working shed have faded I believe that the usage is changing - but we must follow our sources. Other opinions welcome-- Clem Rutter (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As the preservation soc. calls it Bancroft Mill I think this article should. J3Mrs (talk) 15:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bancroft Shed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723183726/http://oneguyfrombarlick.co.uk/forum_topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=7926&FORUM_ID=99&CAT_ID=3&Forum_Title=Rare+Text+(Book+Transcriptions)&Topic_Title=ARTHUR+ROBERTS+ENGINE+LIST&whichpage=1&tmp=1 to http://oneguyfrombarlick.co.uk/forum_topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=7926&FORUM_ID=99&CAT_ID=3&Forum_Title=Rare+Text+(Book+Transcriptions)&Topic_Title=ARTHUR+ROBERTS+ENGINE+LIST&whichpage=1&tmp=1#pid81483

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]