Talk:Bandarban District

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The Tourism Entry[edit]

The tourism part of this page has been edited for content that felt like endorsement or advertising. But, in reality, all the information that were imparted in that part was meant to be helpful for anyone who wanted to visit Bandarban. No tourism information is complete or useful without proper names and value attribution (check any of the lonely planet books, the best of tourist information books available). And, I really don't think that calling Einstein a great physicist is "advertisement or endorsement", even Encyclopaedia Britannica does that.

Please, discuss before you make drastic decisions on the entry. I have taken a trip to Bandarban myself to verify every information possible on hand and talked to hundreds of people. I hope original research on topics poorly reaserched is not discouraged here. Thank you all, and especailly Ragib, to take the time and trouble to improve the entry. (Aditya Kabir 14:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]


Aditya, I appreciate the great work you did to singlehandedly lift this article to the nice state it is now. I'm even thinking of going for a featured article status some time in future. I also agree that your intentions were clear and in good faith to make the article better.
Now, here is the thing, there is a difference between an encyclopedic article's handling of tourism versus a writeup for a magazine or tourist guide. You can take the example of Kolkata and the related page Places_of_interest_in_Kolkata. You can mention notable places, but to pick hotel A over hotel B is ok for a guide but not ok for an encyclopedia.
For the transport section, you cannot say that a particular service A is preferable. That's an opinion, right? You can say that these services A, B etc are available. But to say this A is preferable over B would mean you are judging them ... the question is "according to who?" So, I removed the names of the preferred bus services.
The other paragraph I somewhat pruned is the hotels section. The same thing goes here, you cannot put "this hotel is the best" in an encyclopedic entry ... questions like "according to who? based on what?" would arise. I think I might have pruned too much there, i.e. it would have been ok to have the hotel names without commenting on their notability. But again you cannot put qualitative judgement of things/organisations there.
I hope my point is clear, I do appreciate your great effort, and I just took some more cleanup steps to make this article NPOV. Having NPOV is one of the most important things for any article. Please keep up your great work of improving the page. Thanks. --Ragib 18:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. I wish I recieved it earlier, and I wish I understood the "policies and guidelines" better. Anyways, appropriate changes are on the way. (Aditya Kabir 15:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

From peer review[edit]

Please, check out the Bandarban District article and make suggestions. It would be even more helpful if someone lent a hand at making it better. - Aditya Kabir 17:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey people, how do I get others to review this article? No takers? PLEASE!!! - Aditya Kabir 11:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bandarban District[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[1]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 52 km, use 52 km, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 52 km.[2]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.[3] Specifically, an example is 4 km.
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[4]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 20 additive terms, a bit too much.
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
    • Temporal terms like “over the years”, “currently”, “now”, and “from time to time” often are too vague to be useful, but occasionally may be helpful. “I am now using a semi-bot to generate your peer review.”
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [5]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 21:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ See footnote
  2. ^ See footnote
  3. ^ See footnote
  4. ^ See footnote
  5. ^ See footnote

Highest Peak?[edit]

On the Geography of Bangladesh page and Keokradong page it states that neither Keogradong nor "Tazing Dong (sometimes spelled as Tahjingdong, and also known as Bijoy)" are the highets points of Bangladesh, so I removed it. Omishark 14:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal, instead of rewriting when you knew the appropriate was very improper, and showed a lack of respect for other editors. I put the stuff back in with appropriate corrections. Aditya Kabir 03:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Appologies, thanks for correcting it. Omishark 04:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Bawm conversion to Christianity ??[edit]

"Now converted almost totally to Christianity they have taken full advantage of the church to become the most educated people in the district.[citation needed]" - This statement seems like a personal opinion, is there any source of this claim ?? - alif.

Yes, it needs a citation. But, it hardly is a personal opinion. I wonder if someone has any information contrary to the info on conversion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Bandarban District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Bandarban District[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Bandarban District's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "banglapedia":

  • From Dhaka: Chowdhury, A.M. (23 April 2007). "Dhaka". Banglapedia. Archived from the original on 16 May 2019. Retrieved 23 April 2007.
  • From Dinajpur District, Bangladesh: Ahmad Hossain (2012). "Dinajpur District". In Sirajul Islam; Ahmed A. Jamal (eds.). Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh (Second ed.). Asiatic Society of Bangladesh.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:38, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bandarban_District&oldid=1199456503"