Talk:Bar mitzvah attack

Computer Security: Computing Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

13 years old?[edit]

The paper doesn't explain the name anywhere, but presumably this is called the "bar mitzvah" attack because the RC4 vulnerability it uses is 13 years old, the same age as the age for a bar mitzvah? -- Impsswoon (talk) 01:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's the reasoning given at http://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/ssl-tls-suffers-bar-mitzvah-attack-/d/d-id/1319633 --198.103.167.20 (talk) 19:14, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnote needed[edit]

Per Fiamma Nirenstein Terror: the new anti-semitism and the war against the West 2005 Page 193 "The second one to be collected on is Ziad Muhammed Das, commander of a group of Tanzim who planned and carried out the bar mitzvah attack in Hedera. Six victims because of him. The last one, Amar Qadam, is without further details, ..." - a hatnote is required on this article. Maybe a rethink about titling is required too? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:49, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]