Talk:Baranowski

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lithuania Low‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthroponymy List‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
List	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

page[edit]

I think this page should be reformed as a disambig page, to ease some resultant WP:POV (or WP:OR issues.--Lokyz 21:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So called source[edit]

"Source" presented by IP not even mention Baranauskas, not even speaking that this "source" hardly can be named as RS, especially then there are no data about authors linguistic background. Therefore I restored article to NOV version. M.K. (talk) 11:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As IP still waging edit war, I repeat my self - how reliable presented source (geocites), who is the author of it and his credentials in linguistics, as well as how the "source" is relevant then there is no mentioning of such surnames. M.K. (talk) 13:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]