Talk:Basrur

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Karnataka may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Horrible Entry[edit]

This entry is horrible. It mixes various issues, seemingly randomly, in the text. The English is particularly bad, and the article is very subjective. This needs a serious re-write. Sadly, I don't know anything about the town. Thamis 13:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! I'd flagged it for rewrite and came to here to say slightly less directly what Thamis has said. There may be varieties of English but this takes the dog's biscuit. There's an awful lot of poorly written subcontinental cultural vanity in WP.--SilasW (talk) 21:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Far above adding a photo to improve the quality of the article there is the need to get it rewritten to be understandable and in standard English.--SilasW (talk) 09:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Basrur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091227074736/http://basrur-mahalingeshwara-tmpl.com/index.html to http://basrur-mahalingeshwara-tmpl.com/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]