Talk:Batley and Spen (UK Parliament constituency)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Parliament constituencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK Parliament constituenciesWikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesTemplate:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesUK Parliament constituencies articles

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Batley and Spen (UK Parliament constituency) is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Batley and Spen (UK Parliament constituency)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires inline references adding using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Complete missing election years
Incomplete list tag appears to be incorrect or does it refer to the following section on election results?

Keith D 14:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

I think it is extremely insensitive to already put a by-election table on when she has only just died. Shame on you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.106.58 (talk) 16:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Until a writ is moved for a by-election it seems inappropriate anyway, especially given the statements by the conservatives on not standing a candidate and the lack of a timetable. I've removed both, they can be reverted as and when the above happens. After all, this is supposed to be an encyclopedic entry, not a predictive resource.82.33.144.136 (talk) 09:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up from the above (I note the removal of they by-election element was reverted) at present all the major UK parties are saying they won't contest a by-election, if it is uncontested I assume we'll follow the format from other constituencies that had uncontested elections which doesn't seem to be a by-election box but rather something on the lines of:

=== Elections in the 1910s ===

General Election 1918, Rhondda: William Abraham returned unopposed

Essentially people are jumping the gun on this, it could well involve a process we haven't seen since WWII in a parliamentary election.

I won't remove it again, but I think there is a good argument to do so. 82.33.144.136 (talk) 15:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 June 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved.(non-admin closure) Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 21:53, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Batley and Spen (UK Parliament constituency) → Batley and Spen – There's nothing else called Batley and Spen, so parenthesis isn't needed here. Using the argument "all the others are styled like this" is hardly convincing. Unreal7 (talk) 20:39, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It is good to standardise on a single naming convention for all of these articles rather than have some with and some without a qualifier. Keith D (talk) 21:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (UK Parliament constituencies), having WP:CONSISTENCY is an asset to these articles and redirects already exist so there is no problem with people not being able to find them. Ebonelm (talk) 22:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support: This is a ridiculous policy. We don't do this for Canadian electoral districts (e.g. Ottawa South). -- Earl Andrew - talk 22:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Earl Andrew, but we do do this for all provincial electoral districts in Canada, e.g. Ottawa South (provincial electoral district), even when they don't align. It makes it much easier to tell whether an article is about a constituency or a place when there are big lists as well. Ebonelm (talk) 00:52, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. That's just Ontario, which uses the same riding boundaries. See also Calgary-Greenway or Taillon or Inuvik Boot Lake, etc. Check out Category:Canadian provincial and territorial electoral districts. Also, consistency is a bogus reasoning when it comes to disambiguation. We don't have a disambiguation marker around every single article on Wikipedia. What makes UK constituencies so different? -- Earl Andrew - talk 19:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: per Ebonelm's well-cited reasoning. for (;;) (talk) 06:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ebonelm. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ebonelm. --Editor FIN (talk) 13:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Batley and Spen (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090905001322/http://www.kirklees.gov.uk:80/community/statistics/census2001by-town/census2001-by-town.shtml to http://www.kirklees.gov.uk/community/statistics/census2001by-town/census2001-by-town.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Batley and Spen (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]