Talk:Batman: The Killing Joke (film)

Film: Comic book / American / Animated C‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Animation: American / Films / Warner Bros. Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Warner Bros. Animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Comics: DC Comics / Batman / Films Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Batman work group.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Plot[edit]

I just wrote the plot, AFTER SEEING THE MOVIE TWICE (once to see it, and twice to write the plot). so please, don't delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumerwritter (talk • contribs) 06:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the plot (again after seeing the movie-again-twice), so please DO NOT DELETE IT. (P.S: just for everyone to know, if you keep deleteing it i'll keep re-posting it) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumerwritter (talk • contribs) 23:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Schoolboy-like grammar mistake[edit]

I deleted had been escaped,as any american speaker(ps:i'm not american, but i have an advanced level of english speaking and writting) can see this is downright wrong, and replaced it with had escaped, wich is the correct way of writting.

Please take note:

had been escaped should be "had been escaped"

"american" should be "American" (error made twice)

"i'm" should be "I'm" and "i" should be "I"

"english" should be "English"

"writting [sic]" should be "writing" (error made twice)

had escaped should be "had escaped"

"wich [sic]" should be "which"

I don't know where you come from, friend, but if this dog's breakfast of spilt alphabet soup represents an "advanced level of english [sic] writting [sic]" where you come from, then I would not like to see who might typify the average.Myles325a (talk) 06:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reception?[edit]

Considering it made it's budget back in only 2 showings unadvertised in theaters I'm not sure anyone can call it anything but a wild success. Might want to add a section where it was WILDLY successful among fans. 65.29.77.61 (talk) 22:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Batman Beyond 2.0[edit]

Should we mention somewhere how the Bruce/Barbara relationship was already revealed in 2014 via this comic?

All the responses here make it seem like this is news, but it's OLD news. Ranze (talk) 01:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Theatrical film?[edit]

Should this movie, along with Batman: Return of the Caped Crusaders, be considered a theatrical film? Even though it had a limited release in theaters, it is not considered a theatrical film by Warner Bros. Warner Bros.'s theatrical films (live action or animated) opens with "Warner Bros. presents" while direct-to-video films do not do that. This movie does not open with "Warner Bros. presents" and instead opens with the Warner Bros. Animation logo in the same manner as the last DC comics-based direct-to-video film Justice League vs. Teen Titans. And in the Warner Bros. Animation article also, it is, along with Batman: Return of the Caped Crusaders, listed under Direct-to-video features instead of Feature-length films. - Ash wki (talk) 13:26, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Original research?[edit]

There's a line reading "It is not the first time that Brian Azzarello has depicted the Joker as a rapist.[37]," with the cited material being an issue of a comic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.143.231.125 (talk) 06:49, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]