Talk:Battista Serioli

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battista Serioli article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2008. The result of the discussion was No Consensus, defaults to Keep.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Military history: Biography / European / Italian / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War I task force

PROD template added by BrownHairedGirl, removed by Bart Versieck[edit]

I agree that this article is not a good candidate for PROD. It asserts good reason for notability, but if necessary it can be taken to AfD to achieve consensus. I personally would be in favour of keeping this, although not strongly in favour, only a weak keep.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 03:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this article should go the same way as Carmelo Bertolami for the same reasons that Bertolami went that way. The entire article is referenced by one local obituary, which doesn't even mention his date of death, making it a pretty poor excuse for an obituary. I've searched and there just aren't too many sources out there for Serioli. On an interesting side note, there's a deletion discussion for Erich Kästner on the German Wikipedia on the claims that he's not notable enough for inclusion. And he's the last veteran from that country! Cheers, CP 07:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How ironic, Paul. Extremely sexy (talk) 18:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's ironic? Cheers, CP 18:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello: that even Germany doesn't want to know about him at all, of course. Extremely sexy (talk) 12:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explain how that's irony. Maybe it is if we kept his article on the English wikipedia and it was deleted on the German one, but even then, I think that's more incongruity than irony. It would be irony maybe if Kastner had gone around the German wikipedia, saving articles from being deleted, then got his own deleted. Actually, that would be pretty funny. Cheers, CP 19:38, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No: I just meant to say that it would be extremely ironic if the last (known) WWI veteran who fought for Germany would lose his own article at the German wikipedia, hence. Extremely sexy (talk) 00:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well he did, the article was deleted. Cheers, CP 18:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be totally honest about the original PROD of this article, I'd say that it shows that User:BrownHairedGirl had not adhered to the WP:PROD process in this one case, as it only refers to uncontroversial deletions that don't quite meet the speedy deletion criteria. To quote from the article - Battista Serioli was one of the last four Italian veterans of the First World War. From that stated fact, it's nowhere near an uncontroversial deletion. Much more appropriate for AfD.-h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 01:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]