Talk:Battle at the Binary Stars

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle at the Binary Stars article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Star Trek Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

Canada: Ontario / Toronto / Television Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

Rotten Tomatoes citation[edit]

@Koavf: I understand why you would want this to be consistent, but it is also the general style to have the rotten tomatoes citation up with the info because it is not a complete reference, it needs to be updated whenever the data is updated, and users generally won't do that if it isn't right there for them to do so. I believe that is a valid reason to break with consistency, which is why most articles do it. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:19, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a complete reference? That's true of every URL: they can all change. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But generally you get the information and add the complete reference. With stuff like the review aggregates, the information keeps needing to be updated for quite a while, and the reference along with it. It's hardly the same as all the other references. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Short Description[edit]

Please allow a short description. The first I offered was imported from Wikidata, which is where they come from by magic if there isn’t one on page. It was reverted with a cryptic comment by User:Koavf. So I offered a shorter “short description” which User:Koavf also reverted. This time with a better comment, at least in context.

What wikidata gives us is often not very good, some of what it has is graffiti. Our pages need short descriptions on page where editors can see, refine and improve them.

—¿philoserf? (talk) 00:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Philoserf, Why are inserting a short description that is identical to the one that is generated by the infobox? This is the definition of busywork. I just cannot understand for the life of me the value in this. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It it? That isn't what I saw.—¿philoserf? (talk) 05:41, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Philoserf, What did you see? How did you see it? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]