Talk:Battle of Kampar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Suggestions[edit]

I've done a bit of copy editing work on this article and have the following suggestions for improvement:

  • currently there is only a Japanese estimate of the British/Indian casualties - are their any Allied accounts that confirm or contradict this number?
  • are there any Japanese sources that relate to this battle?
  • if possible, more precise citations for the Smith work would help improve the verifiability of the article. For instance, Footnote # 2 has a large page range, but it could be possible to cite individual pages, or at least smaller page ranges;
  • the Jeffrey source is listed but doesn't appear to be specifically cited. If possible, in line citations to this work should be worked in;
    • I've moved this to a Further reading section, but if anyone has access to the source and wants to add some citations to it, it could just be moved back to the References section. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • for a B class rating, the article will need some more in line citations, I have added tags to where I feel they are needed;
    • I have added in a few references from a couple of different sources, so I think that this has been taken care of now. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • there are a couple of dead link tags, if possible these could be replaced with archived versions from http://web.archive.org.

I don't have any sources, so I'm unable to help in this regard, sorry. Good work so far. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:14, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed a couple of these, but am not able to deal with the top three. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Kampar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]