Talk:Battle of Lang Vei

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBattle of Lang Vei has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 5, 2011Good article nomineeListed

A couple of suggestions[edit]

Hi, good work with this so far. I made a couple of minor tweaks for grammar and style and have a couple of minor suggestions for this article:

  • currently there is a mixture of date format. For instance the lead has "6–7 February", but elsewhere "February 6", etc. The format should be consistent, although either way is fine;
  • both "armoured" and "armored" are used (and their variations) - it should probably just be "armored" given it is mainly using US spelling;
  • Note # 14 should probably have details like title, publisher, accessdate etc. added to it;
  • Notes # 29 and 30 "Cash (1985), p. 131" appear to be the same and could be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS as this has been done with the others;
  • ISBNs and OCLC numbers could be added to the References. They can be found at http://www.worldcat.org/. This helps readers locate the books in their local library systems.

Anyway, keep up the good work. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the ISBNs and OCLC numbers to the references. TeriEmbrey (talk) 16:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Lang Vei/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: Two found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 19:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: I am getting "Server Application Unavailable " on the links to http://tinhdoanquangtri.gov.vn This may be a temporary problem. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:57, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • That website is working fine in my part of the world, so I have no idea what is happening there.Canpark (talk) 13:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, I guess that it just isn't accessible from the UK. I shall assume good faith. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    ''To accomplish those tasks, Willoughby had at his disposal one Montagnard, four South Vietnamese rifle companies, and three combat reconnaissance platoons. One Montagnard waht? Company, platoon? Done
    Hre tribesmen, ?? What are these? Montagnard? Needs explanation, I feel. Done
    Otherwise prose fine, accords with MoS
  • I have clarified the first part by adding 'company', and added a link to the article on the Hre people of Vietnam because they were different to the Montagnards.Canpark (talk) 13:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    References appear OK, assume good faith for off-line.
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Through and focussed
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Licensed and captioned
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just a couple of issues, noted above, on hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:06, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, thanks for the fixes, passing as GA

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Lang Vei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Lang Vei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible introduction[edit]

The introduction is horribly written. Its basically an entire history of the battle from one narrow perspective frontloaded into the article. An all too common trend these days. 2600:1700:CA01:F20:AD0D:A506:2931:45AD (talk) 06:23, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Provide specific comments rather than just a general criticism. Mztourist (talk) 08:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Battle_of_Lang_Vei&oldid=1206172874"