Talk:Battlefleet Gothic/Archive 1

Merger

If this is merged with Games Workshop, i won't cry. —This unsigned comment was added by Ltclarke (talk • contribs) .

cry. —This unsigned comment was added by 150.101.106.188 (talk • contribs) .

Other GW games have their own pages, too. Wouter Lievens 09:43, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

I don't think anyone is seriously suggesting that it is merged. The initial merger "suggestion" was made on 2005-07-30 by a user whose total contribution to Wikipedia was three edits, and the reply was by an anonymous IP whose total contribution was that one edit. Cheers --Pak21 09:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Phew. Good to know. Wouter Lievens 14:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Space Fleet

I've added a wiki link to the Space Fleet page which I'm writing. Oni no Akuma 17:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Inspiration

I'm removing the inspiration section, it is entirely opionion and original research. In my opinion ofr instance, the Tau bear little resemblance to a modern fleet, modern fleets don't have big hooks to keep the destroyers attached to the carriers. Nor do carriers have that kind of firepower. They remind me more of the Post-Midway IJN Fleet, aircraft coming out of all the battleships, like the Ise. Leaving out the Yamato and Musashi of course, they didn't fit terribly well anyways. Course I'm not gonna say that in the article, because its rubbish and my opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 06:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Exterminatus

Why is Exterminatus linked to this page? It obviously had it's own page, why was it removed / linked here? Sure, initiating the Exterminatus order needs the fleet to be there, but then it should refer to the Imperial troops, particularly the Imperial Navy section. Battlefleet Gothic is an another Games Workshop game, just set in the WH40K universe. Referring to the page directly seen here http://warhammer40k.wikia.com/wiki/Exterminatus - copied from Wikipedia in the past.

Exterminatus can't meet the guidelines for Verifiability in fiction, which basically means 3rd party sources. The Imperial Navy can't either, which is why it was redirected to BFG as that page will remain, and is probably the most useful place for a redirect. All those articles are going to be Transwikied and redirected as per the discussion here. A list of transwikied articles can befound here, and our page where we're figuring out what goes where is here. The pages are being transwikied to The Warhammer 40,000 Wikia, which you have linked to. --Falcorian ^(talk) 20:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Broken Link

Although it appears that the rulebook was freely released, the link to it is broken and all available references point to the same unavailable target. -Kris Schnee (talk) 18:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Looks like GW have overhauled their website and integrated the Specialist Games one. I've corrected the link. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Battlefleet Gothic. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for //http%3A//www.games-workshop.com/gws/content/article.jsp%3FcategoryId%3Dcat1290343%26aId%3D4300022

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battlefleet Gothic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711071851/http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/content/article.jsp?categoryId=cat1290343&aId=4300022 to http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/content/article.jsp?categoryId=cat1290343&aId=4300022

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

@InternetArchiveBot could you please advise how to access this WebArchive/Wayback machine link to the old 2009-2015 GW website please? I tried numerous ways but it always prompts me by asking my location and requiring Cookies and Javascript but it never allows me to get in the website? Any help would be much appreciated but otherwise we cannot verify sources. Cheers. Robzaor1987 (talk) 15:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)