Talk:Baume et Mercier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Removed the link *Baume et Mercier Watches This domain name expired on 01/28/08 and is pending renewal or deletion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.16.79.239 (talk) 09:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Removed the link *Emblematics models of Baume et Mercier —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.16.79.239 (talk) 13:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Baume et Mercier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baume et Mercier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Radical rewriting without sources[edit]

As bad as the previous version might have been, I don't think this is gonna fly. Nemo 19:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Re: NPOV) I'm pretty concerned[edit]

This article seems extremely promotional, and not based on fact. It only mentions an "affiliation" with the Richemont group, and the History section reads like promotional material. Additionally, the section about their Caliber talks about the "magnetic fields of everyday life", which also sounds promotional. I'm no Wikipedia pro, but this is definitely a bit odd. I'd appreciate if someone more experienced could take a look.

That's because the entire page was replaced by a corporate flyer recently. I've now reverted to the previous version, minus the catalog-like details. Do you see something worth recovering in the removed material? Nemo 08:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Nemo, that's perfect. Bob 16:38, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]