Jump to content

Talk:Beautiful, Dirty, Rich/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Sustainability of this Page

Hey guys, as you can see, I have put this page back up again. I can already tell that there will probably be some dispute regarding this so please, if you feel as though you need to delete this article please discuss it with me first. I believe that it deserves to stay as it was released as a single or should I say promotional single for an American television series. You can go to Lady GaGa's official website, click on music and Beautiful, Dirty Rich will be there with a release date and album artwork. It has been confirmed so it would be appreciated if you don't throw messages of dispute at me stating "That wasn't a proper single", "It wasn't released a regular singe" etc, etc. You get the point. Any issues, then please do not hesitate to send me a message.

Please, feel free to edit the article. As long as the information comes from a reliable source or is generally classified as true then by all means, edit away.

Thank's guys, Take Care
--Youstinklmao (talk) 05:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh good! I was going to add this myself. :) Tikkuy (talk) 06:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, does that mean Christmas Tree merits an article as it's a digital/promo single isn't it? wut (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.109.73.93 (talk) 22:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
While both songs have charted, this song – with heavy promotion including a music video, and also a good amount of info on its origin – was able to be expanded into a decently-sized article. "Christmas Tree" is just a promo single that doesn't have much available info about it. So no. D.C. Blake (talk) 15:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Live performance picture caption

The caption under the picture of Lady GaGa says "Gaga performing the song on The Fame Ball Tour..." but the image description page states that she is singing "Paparazzi", not "Beautiful, Dirty, Rich". Elfalem (talk) 02:15, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

The description should be corrected in the commons. --Legolas (talk2me) 14:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)