Talk:Beautiful Awakening

Untitled[edit]

"Beautiful Awakening is doing well outside the U.S.. On Itunes, the album is in the top 100 or better on both the Top 100 and Pop album charts."

Not true. The only country this album has managed to do well at the moment is Japan. On all the other charts it has failed. Harry** 23:06, 6 September 2006.

Beautiful Awakening US versus UK cover[edit]

Maybe this is a touchy subject, but it's only Wikipedia, so it shouldn't be that serious: US or UK? I switched the Beautiful Awakening cover to the US version, and someone switched it back to the UK version. Since I'm from the US, I ethnocentrically just think "our" version is the best version. But it is true that the UK version was out first. So which one should we go for? That way we won't constantly be switching back and forth when the US version finally comes out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Souldier77 (talk • contribs) 11:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

We need to do the US version! Wikipedia is a US site isn't it? I don't care if that one was out first. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.191.27.139 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 12 December 2006.

I like both versions but it doesn't matter if one looks better than the other because that is putting it into a different point of view, the original should be put up. Lillygirl 22:59, 12 December 2006.

OK, trying to at least solve this on the Stacie Orrico page, I just put up both covers. Both are very nice. But funny... so far, no one's complaining that the Japanese cover isn't up. lol — Souldier77 23:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, the US version generally takes presedence since Wikipedia is based there. Jgcarter 22:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. version is not needed anymore since the album is not (and may not be) released there. It is best to put up the original, rather than a "cancelled" version. Lillygirl (talk) 16:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful Awakening Pushed Back AGAIN!!![edit]

It will not be released according to Stacie Orrico Online. It's set to be released in March. This is SO STUPID!!!

I think I missed something...didnt it already come out? I checked it out from my library a couple of months ago. Jgcarter 04:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Beautiful Awakening. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beautiful Awakening. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]