Talk:Bedell Covered Bridge

United States: New Hampshire / Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Low-importance).

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I don't think they'll try again[edit]

It seems to me that if you don't succeed the first five times, perhaps it's not a good idea to try again. - Denimadept 01:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which category makes more sense?[edit]

I've currently got the article in both Bridge disasters and Demolished bridges. In all cases, this bridge seemed to come down due to natural causes, not man-made, which makes me think that the "disaster" label is more appropriate. Still, it seems to me to be a bit of an overstatement to call it a "disaster". What makes sense? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denimadept (talk • contribs) 01:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest disasters. Demolished bridges is for bridges that were deliberately taken down by man. -- Kvetner 16:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Over-stated or not, I suspect it was a disaster to those who wanted to have the bridge there. - Denimadept 16:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photos?[edit]

You want photos of a bridge which isn't there? Okay... - Denimadept (talk) 03:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better now? - Denimadept (talk) 04:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, historic images of the bridge would be nice. Magic♪piano 14:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No lie, that. Unfortunately, my Tardis is in the shop. :-> I have located a postcard image, which should be on its way to me shortly, but as it's listed as "1960s era", it's probably too new to use. - Denimadept (talk) 17:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted the postcard. The postcard has to date from between 1957 to 1963, as it has a 3¢ stamp. I may attempt to contact the photographer for more explicit permission. - Denimadept (talk) 06:36, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bedell Covered Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061003042658/http://www.town.haverhill.nh.us/bedellbridge.html to http://www.town.haverhill.nh.us/bedellbridge.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]