Talk:Behavioralism

Question[edit]

does anyone know something about this? -anon

not a clue. Just that it doesn't seem to be the same thing as behaviourism. –M^T 09:11, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not much more than a Wiktionary entry. Should be compressed, the quotes merely fluff it up. --Uncle Ed 22:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've attempted to make this article more verifiable by adding a few citations. Most of what was stated in the article I found in my textbook... I added in all the relevant quotations so it can be double-checked in case anyone would like to add additional citations for certain points. I'm certain many of them could do with a few more references to note the statements. Yaminator (talk) 03:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello durham politics students —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.158.173 (talk) 17:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements[edit]

I am currently working on a lengthier, more detailed version of this page on my sandbox; if anyone has any suggestions for additions or things to fix, that would be appreciated! I am trying to fill in more information and I've started researching some criticisms of the approach. Edit anything I've got as well -- it would be a big help. Google books has also been a big help -- there are a number of publications regarding behaviouralism. Yaminator (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

I've added a bit more to the article. I admit I'm not very good at paraphrasing information when I think the quotation is sufficient, so if someone would like to paraphrase as need be, that would be great. Yaminator ^talk 22:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The German version of this page has a lot of information. I've tried running it through a translator, but the context gets lost. It also does not cite its sources at all. It does have some interesting points, but I'm a little wary of using anything since its citations are pretty insufficient. The Portuguese version also has a great lead and "Origins" section that could be incorporated into this article. Even translated, the tone of the Portuguese version is a lot more comprehensive than this one. I'll try to incorporate the language from the Portuguese version soon. The page ratings for this page aren't too great and it's definitely very technical right now with a lot of specific jargon. :( Yaminator ^talk 18:03, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Behavioralism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How is this different from Behaviorism?[edit]

This seems like Behaviorism with a focus on politics. Not sure the difference really. Thedonquixotic (talk) 00:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]