Talk:Belit sağ
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Contested deletion[edit]
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because we (Art+Feminism at Squeaky Wheel, Buffalo, NY) are currently editing this page to address the speedy deletion criteria. --Srkrm (talk) 22:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
- Clarification: this account is a personal account. The initial article was a template which several users are now editing. --Srkrm (talk) 00:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not buying the WP:COPYVIO. I checked with the dupe detector, and almost all the dupes are proper nouns, titles of work, or titles of exhibition venues. I copyeedit one sentence that had a couple of these in a row. Its clean now. Removing Flag. --Theredproject (talk) 03:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
copyright question[edit]
In good faith: I am a librarian trying to assess if I can help with copyright aspect of this page but I see that the revision history is now greyed out, which makes this more difficult. user:diannaa can you help me understand? the artchivist (talk) 15:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Artchivist1. I finished the copyright cleanup and performed revision deletion, which is why you can't view the history any more. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi user:diannaa, I am still not quite following: was the rationale blatant copyright violation? Confused because creating editor had established contact with copyright owner so there seems to be potential for sorting this out legitimately. Revision deletion seems extreme. Would you consider reversing?the artchivist (talk) 16:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- I won't be undoing the revision deletion, as the copyright material needs to be removed completely from the page history and hidden from view. If the copyright holder wishes to release this material under a compatible license, please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi user:diannaa, I am still not quite following: was the rationale blatant copyright violation? Confused because creating editor had established contact with copyright owner so there seems to be potential for sorting this out legitimately. Revision deletion seems extreme. Would you consider reversing?the artchivist (talk) 16:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)