Talk:Ben Garrison/Archive 1

Archive 1

August 2018

It's surprising no major sources have written about Garrison, he's pretty popular and definitely could be described as an unhinged extremist. This may sound like hyperbole but I've seen many of his cartoons and they seem like they were drawn by a mad-man who spends all his time reading far-right conspiracy theories.--Craigboy (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, a quick edit but the first Ben Garrison edits did NOT start in 4chan but instead in 4chon's /new/. That *chan is no longer up but it was in the period between when 4chan had deleted /new/ and 4chan opening /pol/ (which was about a year-year and a half). I know it's a bit more obscure and there are, obviously, no sources for it but I was literally there when it happened. 195.167.104.114 (talk) 10:17, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Ben Garrison's adult son, regular poster at GrrrGraphics, consistently censored from this article

The editors are very adamant about keeping him out although the Garrisons MAKE NO EFFORT to hide that he's their son. Don't believe it's in good faith but I get it; they don't want him in there at all. Not gonna fight a bunch of bored shut-ins. - 218 forever — Preceding undated comment added 07:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

If there are no reliable sources which discuss Ben's family, we can't discuss it here. Please review WP:RS and WP:V. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 07:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

References

Le Happy Merchant

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Why no one ever made a page about the Antisemitic cartoon, It is only posted on other websites instead?! 06/09/19. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.210.157.225 (talk) 08:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

those are edits from comics by Nick Bougas, Nazis are very fond of editing his characters into Ben Garrison's comics to make them antisemitic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.179.184.17 (talk) 00:57, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Alt-right?

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I don’t know why Ben Garrison is being called a member of the alt-right. His cartoons do attract positive feedback from the alt-right, but there is no evidence showing Garrison to be a member of the movement itself. Plus the cited article doesn’t even mention him as being from the alt-right Jnlt215 (talk) 20:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

This whole article is biased. Sourced by mostly left wing opinion articles.69.73.45.211 (talk) 20:18, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

I agree 100%. This article is a ridiculous Left-Wing hit piece with no basis in reality. The entire Opening is ridiculous — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doniboy71 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Y'all, it's almost like you can edit the articles if you have an issue with their accuracy. That's kind of the whole thing here. You're taking the time to complain but not defend what you say is authenticity? Does that mean you implicitly agree, or that you'd rather be apathetic and let the majority consensus wash over the things that are important to you? Challenge the sources with the rules. Include competing legitimate sources that offer an alternate perspective and find reality somewhere in the middle. Do something constructive besides complain. 2603:9001:6B08:9E6A:61F0:4EE2:4AC3:4A50 (talk) 20:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.