Talk:Bengal Native Infantry/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 12:58, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be starting soon. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:58, 13 May 2018 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
  • Per MOS:CAPFRAG, "If any complete sentence occurs in a caption, then all sentences, and any sentence fragments, in that caption should end with a period."
  • I'd like some background on what the mutiny was in the article.
  • " Two regiments of BNI were serving in China at the time of the outbreak and remained unaffected." needs source
  • I feel like much more information is and context is needed about wartime service. feel free to convince me otherwise, but for now, it does not seem to be comprehensive.
  • Sorry. This has dragged on. Perhaps close, but issues were not resolved. Failing soon. You have a week, Exemplo347 Eddie891 Talk Work 20:36, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]