Talk:Bengal tiger/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 19:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Most generally, the article seems to have a lot of info about the tiger in general, but for this information there is already the article tiger. When specific information on the subspecies is given, it is often not marked as such. Generally, the article should focus on what sets the Bengal tiger apart, what are the differences to the other subspecies. This is not really done as far as I can see.
- Structure is also a mess. The "Characteristics" section has two sub-sections, both of which are on size, although size is already discussed in the paragraph preceding those sections.
- The "Conservation efforts" has sections (in this order) named "In India", "In captivity", "In Bangladesh", which seems chaotic.
- Section "In Bangladesh" does not have a source.
- Culture section has long lists of trivia.
I am stopping here; the article is not close to meeting the GA criteria yet, and needs significant improvement. I encourage the authors to re-nominate once this has been done (PeerReview would be a good point for additional input). --Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)