Talk:Berith (god)

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Berith (god) was copied or moved into Baal Berith with this edit on 22:05, 21 September 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Section[edit]

This page does very little to actually describe the god, Berith. Kutera Genesis (talk) 00:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I hope I've just fixed that. SamEV (talk) 03:44, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fitting since there isn't a god "Berith". It was an epithet of a form of Baal. —

Llywelyn II

11:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate deity?[edit]

Isn't this the same deity as Baal-berith? The exact same Biblical verses are used. If so, I'd suggest merging the pages. --Eddyspeeder (talk) 08:55, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the same way. I've just added merge tags at both pages. SamEV (talk) 04:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but keep the conversation there. —

Llywelyn II

11:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]