Talk:Bernina Railway Ge 6/6 81

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

naming convention[edit]

The German Wikipedia convention for naming an article about a class of railway rolling stock requires the article to begin with the name of the railway company or administration that launched the class and procured the first examples. I have named this article accordingly. As specified in that same convention, I have also created a page named Rhaetian Railway Ge 4/4 181 that redirects to this article. To minimise confusion, the template "Rolling stock of the Rhaetian Railway (RhB)" links to this article via that redirect page.Bahnfrend (talk) 12:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brakes subframe[edit]

Is the section on conversion to a Ge4/4 is the right place for the description of the brakes subframes? Placed there, it can give an impression that these subframes were added during the conversion, while (according to the text in the very same paragraph) they were there from the beginning.

Would not it better to move the description of these subframes into the "Origins as a Ge 6/6" section and reorganise the discussion on the naming accordingly?

By the way, if I understand correctly, the non counting for two additional axes is the source of problems with running the locomotive. :-)

Yklimenko (talk) 09:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]