Talk:Better Government Association
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Better Government Association article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Better Government Association was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 13, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Better Government Association/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Grammarxxx (talk · contribs) 21:12, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Doesn't adhere to MoS, including references.
- A. References to sources:
- No in-line citations: accessdate, author, work, ect...
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Majority of works cited is to the subjects webpage, not a RS.
- C. No original research:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Definitely not, this organizations been around for nearly 100 years and this is all there is?
- B. Focused:
- Too many minor details.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Impossible without RS.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I am quickfailing this article due to a lack of comprehensiveness and poor references that cannot be fixed within 7 days. This article was created yesterday by a new user, I suggest the user read over the good article criteria before nominating any other articles. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 21:17, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
POV and other tags[edit]
This article has fundamental problems. Nearly every sentence is strongly biased in wording and content in favor of the subject. Combine that with terrible sourcing in violation of our policies on both verifiability and original research, and I propose we stubify the article and start anew. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Totally agree with you. I'm removing a vast majority of the content that is unsourced, derived from unreliable sources, or based on trivial coverage. The article will be in a much shorter format once I'm done. Hopefully that will be enough to resolve your tags. Edge3 (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Better Government Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110918052142/http://www.mediabistro.com:80/fishbowlla/2011-edward-r-murrow-award-winners-announced_b31039 to http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlla/2011-edward-r-murrow-award-winners-announced_b31039
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Better Government Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://abclocal.go.com/wls/bio?section=ontv/stationinfo/bios&id=3397458
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlla/2011-edward-r-murrow-award-winners-announced_b31039
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)