This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This page appears to be nothing more or less than an advertisement for "Better for America." Marking for deletion for that reason. I do think the organization may end up meeting notability guidelines, so hopefully there's someone who wants to put the time and effort into creating an objective entry on the subject. Thomas L. Knapp (talk) 14:02, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree that it's unambiguous advertising so removed speedy deletion template but the article as written does seem to have issues so replaced it with notability and peacock tags. I found 2 additional refs on the topic [1], [2] that may be helpful for improving the article. --DynaGirl (talk) 15:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for cleaning up the deletion marking -- I've never marked an article for deletion before and found the instructions confusing. Thomas L. Knapp (talk) 15:55, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
