Talk:Beveridge curve

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

why the name?[edit]

anyone know why the name? Jackzhp (talk) 00:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Destefanis's comment on this article[edit]

Dr. Destefanis has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:


The article is ok. It might need some updating, both methodological and data-oriented. prof. Bart Hobijn could be ideal person for providing the right references.


We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

We believe Dr. Destefanis has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:


  • Reference : Sergio Destefanis & Raquel Fonseca, 2005. "Matching Efficiency and Labour Market Reform in Italy. A Macroeconometric Assessment," CELPE Discussion Papers 93, CELPE - Centre of Labour Economics and Economic Policy, University of Salerno, Italy.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Kosfeld's comment on this article[edit]

Dr. Kosfeld has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:


- Before depicting shifts of the Beveridge curve, I suggest to plot the model of the Beveridge curve. A formula may also be helpful in intrducing the concept of the Beveridge curve.

References: Blanchard O, Diamond P (1989) The Beveridge curve. Brook Pap Econ Act 1:1–76.

Petrongolo B, Pissarides CA (2001) Looking into the black box: a survey of the matching function. J EconLit 39:390–431


We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

We believe Dr. Kosfeld has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:


  • Reference : Reinhold Kosfeld & Christian Dreger & Hans-Friedrich Eckey, 2006. "On the Stability of the German Beveridge Curve: A Spatial Econometric Perspective," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 581, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 20:22, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]