Talk:Beverly Archer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Death?[edit]

I've fully protected this page for two days. We cannot definitively claim that the subject is deceased based on the evidence currently available to us. Right now, all we have is a blog that says she is. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This site also lists it: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/alt.obituaries/miWK_rRS508 Quis separabit? 20:09, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Usenet? Seriously? --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:15, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize if the source was unacceptable. Sometimes it's hard to tell which are reliable or not. I am so happy it is not true. 64 is far too young to die for no apparent reason. Quis separabit? 19:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We can pretty much put this to bed - this appears to be nothing more than a hoax. One of the refs[1] looks to be user-generated content that wasn't close to being a reliable source - the link has since been removed or hidden. The second[2] apparently used the first ref as its source, soon realized its mistake, and also removed it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:28, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax, here's the scoop: http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?t=304884 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.149.198.212 (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]