Talk:Bhagavata

Disambiguation

It has been suggested that the page become a disambiguation page for Bhagavata, which can refer to either of two different religious traditions from two different time periods, as well as an abbreviated name of the Bhagavata Purana. This proposal can be discussed here. --Shruti14 ^{t c s} 18:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

I support the proposal. --Shruti14 ^{t c s} 18:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Support proposal for disambiguation. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 18:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposal clarification I would appreciate if you can outline which two different religious traditions you mean. As I can see the need of the disambiguation but some conclude that 4 c. BC Bhagavata and current Bhagavata sampradaya are the same tradition, and others are branches of that tradition, we need to have one article for all bhagavata traditions? I propose to have 3 main entries in disambiguation

1. Bhagavata religious traditions that include anscient Bhagavatism as a section, as well as other traditions that belong to this line,
2. Bhagavata as the name of purana, with the associated meanings of the term.
3. Bhagavata as a devotee of Bhagavata Purana or Bhagavata(within one of the traditons belonging to Bhagavata No1.)Wikidās ॐ 16:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Narayana worship is non vedic?

Narayana the seer who composed Purusha Sukta(10th mandala of Rigveda),was later deified as the supreme God,how is that non vedic?(the flowchart says so) Nijgoykar (talk) 02:56, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

This is really nuts.49.207.61.24 (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

That's a very incorrect statement. Refer to the main Narayana article for his origin. Chronikhiles (talk) 04:15, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bhagavata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090304122300/http://orissagov.nic.in/e-magazine/Journal/journalvol3/pdf/40-48.pdf to http://orissagov.nic.in/e-magazine/Journal/journalvol3/pdf/40-48.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Rename article as Bhagavatism

For both the purposes of distinguishing the article from other related traditions, and to designate it as the cult rather than its adherents, I propose it be renamed as Bhagavatism. If you agree, please do respond with your assent below. Chronikhiles (talk) 04:19, 4 August 2022 (UTC)