Talk:Bhuj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I was thinking this sounded more like a brochure than a Wikipedia article, so I Googled the exact text. It appears to be taken verbatim from http://www.gujaratplus.com/web/gujarat/cities/bhuj.html (!!) Too new to Wikipedia to be confident in how to procede. Fogster 22:07, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Fogster for the tip-off. I've reverted the article back to its pre-copyvio status. For copyright-related problems, you may refer to this page: Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Regards. --*drew 10:28, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted the article again, after Somilkumar had put the copyvio stuff back. I don't know much about Bhuj, so I'll leave further updates to someone more knowledgeable. -- Frekja 15:13, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As far as spelling of Kachchh is concerned two spellings are widely used one is already mentioned another is Kutch. The later spelling was used by britishers and thus came in to existant. The first spelling is true to its phonetics and also all the government institutes (e.g. Post Office, Telegram office) uses Kachchh'. I believe we should stick to first spelling i.e. Kachchh'

Name Meanings[edit]

The following text was cut from this article as it was unintelligable and unprosed.

bhuj to protect, to govern, to rule; deri. bhukta, bho_jya or bho_gya, bho_ktum, bhuktva_

BHUJ has very uncommon meaning in SANSKRIT language dictionary, BHUJ= to protect, to govern, to rule; (so Bhuj was existing before Jadeja clan took over and govern it. )deri, BHUJ also means DHANI means Husaband. bhukta, bho_jya or bho_gya, bho_ktum, bhuktva_

--Lendorien 15:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup 08/2007[edit]

I completely revised this article. It had become a mass of empty subheadings and repetative text. In addition, someone had copypasted a long religious proclamation about building some religious temple. I've cleaned all that out, trimmed it down and added tags. Hopefully this will help, though given the mass of messy edits lately, I don't have much hope it'll stay this way. --Lendorien 17:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A fine job you've done. I'm not sure the process for removing Cleanup tags, but it's got my vote. Fogster 03:34, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mota Asambia (Kutch, Gujarat)[edit]

Mota Asambia is a small village situated in Kutchh, Gujarat. It is near to 72 (Baunter) Jinalay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.172.20.45 (talk) 12:18, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bhuj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bhuj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Bhuj[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Bhuj's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Religion":

  • From Ujjain: "Table C-1 Population By Religious Community: Madhya Pradesh". censusindia.gov.in. Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India.
  • From Valsad district: "C-16 Population By Religion - Gujarat". census.gov.in. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 15:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]