This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 November 2012. The result of the discussion was Snow Keep.
Split from Bibliography of the American Civil War[edit]
This article was split off from Bibliography of the American Civil War which was too long. Only the opening section is identical --that is because it covers general surveys. Rjensen (talk) 11:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have tagged this article for lacking inclusion criteria. Also, since the members of the list are not independently notable, they should have sources demonstrating that they were taken from the published bibliographies. RockMagnetist (talk) 18:02, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
every reader can just go to google books or amazon books or worldcat and get all the details on each title. there is no rule that says they ach have to be drawn from a published book--this is the internet age! Rjensen (talk) 06:17, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
